Representatives Vaupel & Greig hold panel
discussion on proposed Benefits Corporations
Doing too much of a good thing, such as
buying materials exclusively from local vendors or earmarking part of the
profits for a social cause, can get a corporation in trouble with its
shareholders.
With current law, an incorporated company
is supposed to maximize its profits.
While that doesn’t preclude a company from doing such things as
sponsoring community events or awarding scholarships to students, if a
shareholder feels such activities are hurting the bottom line too much, they
can go to court.
Under proposed legislation in the Michigan
House of Representatives, a business with such philanthropic goals could file
papers with the state as a Benefits Corporation (B-corps) and make them part of
their business mission. It would also protect them from lawsuits from
shareholders seeking a greater profit.
Supporters who favor offering this option
for a business feel it will appeal to entrepreneurs who would like their
business to serve a broader purpose than maximizing profits and that such companies
would appeal to younger workers looking for “meaningful” careers, investors
wanting their money to assist such efforts, and customers wishing to be
supportive.
To better explain this concept and the proposed
legislation, State Rep. Hank Vaupel
(R-Fowlerville) and State Rep. Christine Greig (D-Farmington Hills) hosted an
informational panel forum on Sept. 23 at Cleary College in Howell.
“The House Talent and Place Caucus
introduced this bipartisan legislation to recognize the status of benefit corporations
in our state and allow companies to opt to prioritize their societal mission
within their business model,” Rep. Vaupel said. “I hear from B-corps how their
status as mission-driven businesses helps them grow their businesses by
attracting talented employees, investors and customers.”
“B-corps bring together a business’ desire
to provide a service or product to a community and a desire to serve that
community at the same time,” said Rep. Greig. “I’m enthusiastic about bringing
legal recognition to the B-corp status, to encourage more businesses to take
advantage of such opportunities.”
Also on the panel with the two lawmakers
were Rob Fowler, president of the Small Business Association of Michigan and
Nichole Mangis, of Launch Exchange Detroit, who serves on the board of the
Detroit Chapter of the Social Enterprise Alliance in Michigan. Fowler spoke on
the business impact, while Mangis explained the need for the B-corps bills. She
also explained how business currently obtain certification at a Benefits
Corporation—a process that is industry oriented and does not involved the
government.
The discussion began with remarks by Jason
Boyers, the president of Cleary University, who welcomed the local businesses
leaders, social entrepreneurs and students who were present.
“I’m thrilled about this conversation because
I’m familiar with B-corps from when I was in Raleigh, North Carolina,” he said.
“B-corps recognizes that benefitting society and shareholders are not opposing
goals. We, here at Cleary, really
believe that business creates communities. Also, the younger generation who is
looking for meaningful work. Companies that want to attract this new talent
need to recognize this aspiration.”
Vaupel noted that business needs talent, young
talent is looking for place, which includes lifestyle, and business also a
place to operate. “It’s a reinforcing circle,” he said, adding “A survey
indicated that 88 percent of the MBA graduates said they would work for less if
it was with a business that had a social mission they supported. This desire to
do meaningful work is especially true with the millennial generation. Giving
business the option of being a Benefits Corporation is another option in developing,
retaining, and attracting talent.”
Greig, in her comments, said that a
bi-partisan group of representatives has been working on the proposed
legislation for over a year, but added that the idea of B-Corps has been
discussed in the legislature during previous terms. “We’ve looking at what other
states have done with their legislation “A four-bill package has been
introduced by two Republicans and two Democrats.”
Fowler said the idea that “companies do well
by doing good is not new. The question of ‘what is new?’ and ‘why now’ is this
growing realization that place (or a community) needs business, business needs
talent, and talents wants an attractive place to live and work. Communities
don’t always understand what business needs. If they didn’t, they’d work at
paying more attention. But often business doesn’t know what talent wants.”
Fowler said that retaining talent is a
concern and priority with many companies, adding that “It’s not just skilled
trades, but jobs across the board.”
He said that social entrepreneurship can be
an option for a company along with making a profit. “What we’re finding with millennials
is that want to make widgets that change the world,” he added. “With the legal
recognition of B-corp status from the Michigan Legislature, we can offer
another arrow in the economic quiver for business growth in Michigan.”
The bills would:
--Create a legal status for B-corps — House
Bill 5710 from Rep. Christine
Greig (D-Farmington Hills)
--Require annual benefit reports from
B-corps — HB 5711 from Rep. Hank Vaupel
(R-Fowlerville)
--Update the Business Corporation Act to
include B-corps HB 5712 from Rep. David LaGrand (D-Grand Rapids)
--Update the Business Corporation Act to
require annual benefit reports —HB 5713 from Rep. Joseph Graves (R-Argentine Township)
There are currently 15
certified B-corps in Michigan, including the most recently created Higher
Grounds Trading Company in Traverse City. While companies in Michigan can go
through a certification process to become a B-corp, the status isn’t legally
recognized, and businesses could still be found at fault for engaging in
philanthropy rather than existing solely to make a profit.
“Thirty two other states have already
adopted B-corp legislation, and I’m hopeful that the Legislature will take
quick action on these bills,” Mangis said. She added that while a company can
obtain certification regardless of its legal status, being able to file as a
benefits corporation provides legal protection and it also “maximizes
stakeholder value, not just shareholder value.”
Vaupel pointed out that this legislation is
aimed at companies with shareholders who might wish to change their status or
start-ups who would like to take this route. “A privately-owned company can do
whatever they want,” he said. “And if a group wants to be a non-profit, they
can do that. This would be another option.”
No comments:
Post a Comment